Falls and frailty
Falls, frailty and dignity of risk
Many families of someone in aged care will, at some point, take a phone call about a fall. This section explains what the evidence shows about preventing falls and the injuries they cause, and how safety is weighed against a person’s right to keep moving.
By Dr Josh Hatch, FRACGP
Where to start
Residents & families
Aged care staff
GPs & clinicians
All topics
Falls in aged care: how common, and why
What the numbers say, what causes a fall, and why zero falls is the wrong target
Dignity of risk: the right to keep walking
How safety and freedom are balanced, who decides, and how the decision is recorded
What prevents falls: the evidence
Each common intervention, graded on what trials in aged care homes found
Restraint, bed rails and alarms
Why holding someone still does not keep them safe, and what the rules require
Medicines and falls
Which medicines are linked to falls, what the trials of stopping them show, and where the evidence runs out
Bone health and fracture prevention
Which treatments are worth it in residential care, and how life expectancy changes the answer
Frailty: what it means and what can change
How frailty is described, why it shapes every other decision, and what trials of exercise and food found
After a fall: what should happen
The first hour, the following days, and the questions worth asking
Hip fracture: what to expect and how decisions are made
Outcomes after hip fracture in residential care, why surgery is usually offered, and when not operating is a reasonable choice
Falls: a guide for facility leadership
What the Standards require, what the indicator measures, and where the evidence says effort is best spent
No topics match that filter.
How the evidence is graded
Interventions are graded on randomised trial evidence for the outcome that matters: falls, fractures, function or survival. Trials in residential care are preferred, and evidence from hospitals or from people living at home is labelled where it is used. Numbers in the text link to the source they come from. Where the evidence is weak, conflicting or absent, that is stated.
- Supported by trial evidence Consistent randomised trial evidence of a benefit that matters.
- Promising, not yet proven A real signal, usually from one good trial, not yet confirmed.
- Uncertain / conflicting Trials conflict, or the evidence is too weak to say.
- Not supported Tested in adequate trials without showing a benefit.
- Risk outweighs benefit Evidence of net harm.
Last full evidence review: October 2026.